Diamond Jump

Average: 2.5 (2 votes)
Your rating: None

We think of jumping.  >Ishvarak< dares me even though I know it is a juvenile thing to do.  My essence root would scold me if she found out.  Yet the thrill is tempting.
She signals, “Come on >Noosho<, remember what the singularity knot might do for us.  This could be better than any carnival ride.  And besides, we might transmit to the others – if they exist.”
Steal the prototype?  And nobody has jumped past the first fuzz shell before.
It began several mega-zetta wave-cycles ago during a discussion in the agora.  I remember it well.  I can still actualize our oracle, Ms.  >Radha<, crackling and glowing, her tubules curving around.  She was excited.  The implication of >Imref<’s paradox was profound.  We grok the essence of the universe by a wave-particle duality, and it seems to continue indefinitely.  But so far, there was no evidence of other intelligences.  Were we Pictos alone?  Our scientists peered into the skies of element systems with their teleosensors.  We call them element systems because it seems that they always occur in distinct configurations.  Ours had a central core with six notorps and six nortuens.  We lived in the top pu of the third notorp, juggling around, and at times getting close to the nwod.  We would ride noips to reach the other notrops and nortuens.  Ms. >Radha< told us that, for many eons of wave-cycles, Pictokind believed all core systems were like ours, with an inner spherical fuzz shell of two opposing nortceles, and an outer tetrahydra fuzz shell of four nortcele pairs.  Once in a while, a notohp kicks a nortcele up, and a different and higher fuzz shell appears momentarily, but I am getting ahead of myself, and of >Ishvark<’s dare.
There was a time when Pictos did not know of other element systems.  >Oelilag< was the first to use a teleosensor.  She built a contraption to better project manifold generation fields through the mini-spatial dimensions.  It stunned our folk to learn that other core systems existed, and that furthermore, they were all like our own.  These other core systems are positioned with respect to each other in a face-centered cubic Bravais lattice in terms of our macro-spatial dimensions, with vibrating fuzziness in all dimensions.  This accounted for the outer nortceles being in pairs.  Our system shares nortceles to bond with four neighbouring core systems.  The pattern repeated for as far as we could observe.  In the attempt to better understand this lattice, the agora school developed a new mathematics known as thread nature.  With this new somewhat counterintuitive math, >Veelednem< proposed a radical theory.  She suggested that other types of core systems existed.  >Veelednem< named them as element systems.  Using thread nature, she predicted the exact composition of these systems, ranging from a single notorp core with one nortcele to massive cores with many nortrops and nortuens with multiple wave-shaped layers of fuzz shells of nortceles.  Most Pictos were sceptical.  Then >Elbbuh<, using an advanced teleosensor, explored further into the reaches of the lattice.  She discovered a different type of core system matching one of the types predicted by >Vellednem<.  Since then others were found and so far all have matched the >Vellednem< predictions.
Now we are approaching the main point of my jump.  A wild and wonky philosopher named >Ekard< proposed that other sentient beings might exist and developed her Ekard equation to predict the probability of finding such beings.  She extracted the gauge equations of >Niwrad<’s theory of life genesis, working out possible ways for the tubules, gauge fields, nichyon interactions, and the other mini-spatial dimensional phenomena that form the bioscript of life.  We searched and searched and yet no evidence was found.  This led to >Imref< asking; if the others existed, where is everybody?
Then it happened.  Scientists observed a nortcele transition from a lower to an upper fuzz shell occurring in the >ahpla iruatnec< element system.  It could not be explained by natural causes.  The notohp wavelength causing it must have boosted a nortcele from the lowest fuzz shell to one ten layers higher.  This was a fuzz shell never observed before; at least as best as we could tell from the twists and tugs of the manifold generation fields.  Yet it precisely matched >Veelednem<’s predictions.  A few mega-zetta cycles later, observatories reported the nortcele drop.  The notohp emission had a wavelength higher than that detected before.  As far as >Ishvarak< and I were concerned, it must have been caused by another sentient life form.
“We have to transmit likewise to a tenth fuzz shell layer. We’ll take a nortcele from our first fuzz shell.  One from any sub shell one in either mag-angle-moment should do the trick.”
“You’re crazy,” I signalled. 
>Ishvarak< was so excited; I could still sense her entanglement threads piercing my thought receptor, causing a ringing shrilling sensation.  Nevertheless, we went ahead with our plan, which brings me back to where I started.  Eventually, >Ishvarak< convinced me to go ahead with the jump.  We stole the singularity knot and jumped to the first fuzz shell via illegal niop reversal.  Then we used the singularity knot to resolve fuzzy ambiguity to a crisp point, and injected the nortcele with a virtual notohp.  It was wild, shooting upwards in mere mega wave cycles to the tenth level.  We waited for the drop down to emit the notohp.  Well, we’ve been here for a deca multiple of mega-zetta cycles, waiting, waiting some more, and still waiting, suspended and unable to move in most dimensions. 
I am getting hungry, and then >Ishvarak< signals, “Collapsing daughter of a string, we messed up.”
“We forgot about the information flow limit.  It will take time to catch up. “
“What to catch up?”
“We jumped faster than the permitted time of notohp flight.”
I worry that we might extinguish.  Who knows how we might re-emerge from vacuum fluctuations.  Yet I have hope.  Fortunately, we rehashed before the jump.

About the Author: 
Peter Spasov has taught college-level automation and physics. He enjoys performance theatre and science fiction.

Newsletter Signup

Submit your email address so we can send you occasional competition updates and tell you who wins!

Quantum Theories

A is for ... Atom

This is the basic building block of matter that creates the world of chemical elements – although it is made up of more fundamental particles.

E is for ... Entanglement

When two quantum objects interact, the information they contain becomes shared. This can result in a kind of link between them, where an action performed on one will affect the outcome of an action performed on the other. This “entanglement” applies even if the two particles are half a universe apart.

A is for ... Act of observation

Some people believe this changes everything in the quantum world, even bringing things into existence.

G is for ... Gravity

Our best theory of gravity no longer belongs to Isaac Newton. It’s Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity. There’s just one problem: it is incompatible with quantum theory. The effort to tie the two together provides the greatest challenge to physics in the 21st century.

T is for ... Tunnelling

This happens when quantum objects “borrow” energy in order to bypass an obstacle such as a gap in an electrical circuit. It is possible thanks to the uncertainty principle, and enables quantum particles to do things other particles can’t.

B is for ... Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC)

At extremely low temperatures, quantum rules mean that atoms can come together and behave as if they are one giant super-atom.

H is for ... Hidden Variables

One school of thought says that the strangeness of quantum theory can be put down to a lack of information; if we could find the “hidden variables” the mysteries would all go away.

P is for ... Planck's Constant

This is one of the universal constants of nature, and relates the energy of a single quantum of radiation to its frequency. It is central to quantum theory and appears in many important formulae, including the Schrödinger Equation.

M is for ... Many Worlds Theory

Some researchers think the best way to explain the strange characteristics of the quantum world is to allow that each quantum event creates a new universe.

T is for ... Teleportation

Quantum tricks allow a particle to be transported from one location to another without passing through the intervening space – or that’s how it appears. The reality is that the process is more like faxing, where the information held by one particle is written onto a distant particle.

Z is for ... Zero-point energy

Even at absolute zero, the lowest temperature possible, nothing has zero energy. In these conditions, particles and fields are in their lowest energy state, with an energy proportional to Planck’s constant.

L is for ... Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

At CERN in Geneva, Switzerland, this machine is smashing apart particles in order to discover their constituent parts and the quantum laws that govern their behaviour.

S is for ... Superposition

Quantum objects can exist in two or more states at once: an electron in superposition, for example, can simultaneously move clockwise and anticlockwise around a ring-shaped conductor.

R is for ... Radioactivity

The atoms of a radioactive substance break apart, emitting particles. It is impossible to predict when the next particle will be emitted as it happens at random. All we can do is give the probability that any particular atom will have decayed by a given time.

I is for ... Information

Many researchers working in quantum theory believe that information is the most fundamental building block of reality.

K is for ... Kaon

These are particles that carry a quantum property called strangeness. Some fundamental particles have the property known as charm!

Q is for ... Qubit

One quantum bit of information is known as a qubit (pronounced Q-bit). The ability of quantum particles to exist in many different states at once means a single quantum object can represent multiple qubits at once, opening up the possibility of extremely fast information processing.

L is for ... Light

We used to believe light was a wave, then we discovered it had the properties of a particle that we call a photon. Now we know it, like all elementary quantum objects, is both a wave and a particle!

Y is for ... Young's Double Slit Experiment

In 1801, Thomas Young proved light was a wave, and overthrew Newton’s idea that light was a “corpuscle”.

O is for ... Objective reality

Niels Bohr, one of the founding fathers of quantum physics, said there is no such thing as objective reality. All we can talk about, he said, is the results of measurements we make.

P is for ... Probability

Quantum mechanics is a probabilistic theory: it does not give definite answers, but only the probability that an experiment will come up with a particular answer. This was the source of Einstein’s objection that God “does not play dice” with the universe.

G is for ... Gluon

These elementary particles hold together the quarks that lie at the heart of matter.

F is for ... Free Will

Ideas at the heart of quantum theory, to do with randomness and the character of the molecules that make up the physical matter of our brains, lead some researchers to suggest humans can’t have free will.

I is for ... Interferometer

Some of the strangest characteristics of quantum theory can be demonstrated by firing a photon into an interferometer: the device’s output is a pattern that can only be explained by the photon passing simultaneously through two widely-separated slits.

N is for ... Nonlocality

When two quantum particles are entangled, it can also be said they are “nonlocal”: their physical proximity does not affect the way their quantum states are linked.

R is for ... Reality

Since the predictions of quantum theory have been right in every experiment ever done, many researchers think it is the best guide we have to the nature of reality. Unfortunately, that still leaves room for plenty of ideas about what reality really is!

C is for ... Cryptography

People have been hiding information in messages for millennia, but the quantum world provides a whole new way to do it.

Q is for ... Quantum biology

A new and growing field that explores whether many biological processes depend on uniquely quantum processes to work. Under particular scrutiny at the moment are photosynthesis, smell and the navigation of migratory birds.

D is for ... Dice

Albert Einstein decided quantum theory couldn’t be right because its reliance on probability means everything is a result of chance. “God doesn’t play dice with the world,” he said.

J is for ... Josephson Junction

This is a narrow constriction in a ring of superconductor. Current can only move around the ring because of quantum laws; the apparatus provides a neat way to investigate the properties of quantum mechanics.

B is for ... Bell's Theorem

In 1964, John Bell came up with a way of testing whether quantum theory was a true reflection of reality. In 1982, the results came in – and the world has never been the same since!

W is for ... Wavefunction

The mathematics of quantum theory associates each quantum object with a wavefunction that appears in the Schrödinger equation and gives the probability of finding it in any given state.

X is for ... X-ray

In 1923 Arthur Compton shone X-rays onto a block of graphite and found that they bounced off with their energy reduced exactly as would be expected if they were composed of particles colliding with electrons in the graphite. This was the first indication of radiation’s particle-like nature.

D is for ... Decoherence

Unless it is carefully isolated, a quantum system will “leak” information into its surroundings. This can destroy delicate states such as superposition and entanglement.

S is for ... Schrödinger’s Cat

A hypothetical experiment in which a cat kept in a closed box can be alive and dead at the same time – as long as nobody lifts the lid to take a look.

R is for ... Randomness

Unpredictability lies at the heart of quantum mechanics. It bothered Einstein, but it also bothers the Dalai Lama.

C is for ... Computing

The rules of the quantum world mean that we can process information much faster than is possible using the computers we use now.

U is for ... Uncertainty Principle

One of the most famous ideas in science, this declares that it is impossible to know all the physical attributes of a quantum particle or system simultaneously.

A is for ... Alice and Bob

In quantum experiments, these are the names traditionally given to the people transmitting and receiving information. In quantum cryptography, an eavesdropper called Eve tries to intercept the information.

M is for ... Multiverse

Our most successful theories of cosmology suggest that our universe is one of many universes that bubble off from one another. It’s not clear whether it will ever be possible to detect these other universes.

W is for ... Wave-particle duality

It is possible to describe an atom, an electron, or a photon as either a wave or a particle. In reality, they are both: a wave and a particle.

U is for ... Universe

To many researchers, the universe behaves like a gigantic quantum computer that is busy processing all the information it contains.

V is for ... Virtual particles

Quantum theory’s uncertainty principle says that since not even empty space can have zero energy, the universe is fizzing with particle-antiparticle pairs that pop in and out of existence. These “virtual” particles are the source of Hawking radiation.

H is for ... Hawking Radiation

In 1975, Stephen Hawking showed that the principles of quantum mechanics would mean that a black hole emits a slow stream of particles and would eventually evaporate.

S is for ... Schrödinger Equation

This is the central equation of quantum theory, and describes how any quantum system will behave, and how its observable qualities are likely to manifest in an experiment.